NZVRSU

EUQG

Why Was The Second Death Star As Vulnerable As The First?

Di: Henry

What are the two Death Stars? The first Death Star was 120 kilometers in diameter, while the second Death Star was 160 kilometers in diameter. Much of its interior space was devoted to systems required to maintain its massive superlaser and power plant. This one’s truly a head-scratcher. After the first Death Star was destroyed, the Emperor insisted on pushing full steam ahead on the second Death Star’s construction. Although he made sure the thermal exhaust port weakness was fixed, he repeated many of the same mistakes: believing that a bigger Death Star with more firepower would Large pieces of the second Death Star landed in the oceans of the moon Kef Bir, poisoning the waters around them. Decades after the Battle of Endor, Rey explored these ruins in search of a Sith wayfinder hidden away in Palpatine’s

Why did they build a second Death Star? The second Death Star was constructed on the edge of the Galaxy above Endor, and was built to maintain fear of the Empire and to restore confidence in its ranks after a devastating loss.

Death Star | Wookieepedia | FANDOM powered by Wikia

The second Death Star did not have the same weaknesses of the first. It also was nearing completion in episode VI. This leads me to a few conclusions. The Death Star – the spherical orbiting world in Star Wars movies – was the engineering feat of its futuristic world. It was 87 miles in diameter, and both space station for over a million people and a weapon capable of destroying an entire planet with its powerful laser beam. It was an impenetrable fortress. build a second Death Star But as we all know, it had one vulnerable spot, some overlooked Thermal exhaust ports were shafts which vented heat from reactor cores.[1] The secret Imperial training facility on Daro, which was hidden inside of a mountain, had its thermal exhaust port as one of only two potential exits out of the base, although the sheer drop outside the port made it an unwise prospect without flying transportation.[2] Famously, the Death Star space station had

How did the second Death Star stay so intact?

[Star Wars] Why was the flaw with the Death Star so weak? There was a video I watched a while back that explained the significance of Luke turning off his targeting computer. The Rebels ships might have been momentarily vulnerable while starting the jump but that would be better than facing either the Death Star’s superlaser or the turbolasers of the Imperial Fleet. And even if the Imperial Fleet managed to follow the Rebel Fleet at least the Rebels would have escaped from the Death Star. The DS-2 Death Star II Mobile Battle Station, codenamed Second Sun and DS-2, also known as the Death Star MK. 2, the Death Star Mark 2, Battle Station DS-II, or simply the second Death Star, was a partially completed moon-sized battle station constructed by the Galactic Empire as the successor to the first Death Star. A larger and more powerful Death Star, the second Death

This article contains spoilers for Star Wars #28! Marvel’s comics have finally revealed how the Rebel Alliance first learned about Palpatine’s Second Death Star in Star Wars canon. The Death Star was intended to be the The first Death Star wouldn’t have done much to the Vong, however the second can actually hit moving targets. And would have been a much harder target to destroy. That being said I agree with you. The Death Star was a huge waste of resources and a stupid idea to begin with. Which makes the starkiller base an even dumber idea. The DS-2 Death Star II Mobile Battle Station, codenamed Second Sun, also known as the Death Star MK. 2, the Death Star Mark 2, or simply the second Death Star, was a partially completed moon-sized battle station constructed by the Galactic Empire as the successor to the first Death Star. A larger and more powerful []

The first Death Star that had been built on since before the rise of the empire was supposed to be an instrument of fear to those who dared to oppose the empire but not even a week after it became fully operational it got destroyed by a small group of rebel fighters which totally ruined it’s intimation factor. So why would building a second, a bit larger death star be a good idea? Even

Pretty common topic but I couldn’t find it on here. So..the first Death Star was being built at the commencement of the Clone Wars but wasn’t flying around blowing up planets until Star Wars IV. Roughly 22 years I believe. Meanwhile the second one was up Second, the first Death Star could only fire once every twelve hours, and only on one setting. The second Death Star could fire faster, and exhaust port weakness was fixed at different power levels. The second Death Star still had plenty of guns on the surface, but the lousy contractors never bothered to seal their construction tunnels even though a battle was coming up (No wonder the professors in my school hate contractors). In a battle, the second Death Star would win because it can charge its superlaser faster than the first one. I think it can also move

The first death star had a fuck ton of issues and they were figuring out the laser, the laser was why it took so long. With the second deathstar they knew what they were doing, and had a galaxies worth of resources and people to draw on. The First Order regarded a planet-sized, galaxy-destroying battle station as the next step up from the Death Stars, with a planet in the Unknown Regions providing suitable cover for its construction. However, to destroy a star system required a different and greater power source, which was large enough to be dangerous to the planet itself.

Star Wars: 25 Things About The Death Star That Make No Sense

In The Rise of Skywalker, we see huge pieces of the Death Star II that have landed in the oceans of Endor following the events of Return of the Jedi. How is it possible that such large pieces of this station have remained more or less together, down to there still being glass in the window of Palpatine’s throne room, when the last we saw of this battle station truly a head scratcher was this? Was the second Death Star better than the first? In terms of its primary function, the Death Star II was, much like its predecessor, intended to be a planet killer. This weapon could also be recharged much more quickly than that of the first Death Star. Both of these qualities increased the Death Star II’s capacity for personal defense.

A Death Star was a gargantuan space station armed with a planet-destroying superlaser powered by kyber crystals. The DS-1 Death Star Mobile Battle Station,[5] also known as the DS-1 Orbital Battle Station,[10] was a superweapon that was originally designed by the Geonosians during the waning years of the Galactic Republic. The project was later taken over by the Galactic Marvel’s Star Wars #27 changes the narrative previously established in Legends for how the Rebels got the plans for the second Death Star.

The first Death Star had a long recharge time; maybe the rebels thought the DSII wouldn’t be able Battle Station 5 also known to fire again as quickly as it did. IIRC, the rebels try to move into the Star Destroyer fleet.

[Star Wars] Why did the Empire build a second Death Star? So the first one seems like a pretty decent idea on paper and you probably couldn’t count on what happened at Yavin, but once it did what exactly was the thought process that lead the empire to

The Death Star One was the first ever attempt, plus the weakness was deliberately put there by Galen Erso. Then the Death Star Two didn’t have an exhaust port, this time you had to fly inside it, plus they had a shield on Endor which the Rebels had to destroy first. So the empire did at least try to fix the weakness. A Death Star was a moon-sized Imperial military battle station armed with a planet-destroying superlaser. The Death Star, whose concept had been explored even before the Clone Wars, was the first in a long series of superweapons developed to execute the Tarkin Doctrine. The Death Star was designed to allow Emperor Palpatine to more directly control the Galactic Empire I really don’t understand why people act like this is unbelievable to the point of being a criticism of the movie and requiring an in-universe explanation. First of all, it’s entirely reasonable that a giant impractical superweapon would have a glaring structural weakness that can be taken advantage of to destroy it. Real world military vehicles and ships have weak spots that can cause

Not only was the second Death Star larger and more deadly, but several flaws in the original design were corrected. The vulnerable thermal exhaust ports were replaced with millimeter-wide heat dispersion ducts, leaving no weak spots in this battle station’s armor. This Death Star was larger than the first, about 160 kilometers, or 99 miles, in diameter. It was also more technologically advanced than Death Star 1. Although its superlaser is they constructing the second Death powered by the same kyber crystal technology, the second Death Star was much improved. For one, the new superweapon had additional low-power firing options that could be aimed at Death Star II’s superlaser could recharge much faster, and its reactor wouldn’t have been as vulnerable once it was completed. Don’t know where people are getting the idea that the original Death Star couldn’t target individual ships, though. I see no reason to

Though an overall beloved installment of the Star Wars saga, an often-criticized plot element of Star Wars: Return of the Jedi is its use of a second Death Star and the Rebel Alliance’s method of destroying it via a fatal flaw in

First of all, the main reason why there wasn’t a fleet at Yavin was because the Empire was overconfident enough to believe that the Death Star would singlehandedly destroy the Rebellion and wanted to prove to the galaxy how powerful it truly was. Luke Skywalker was able to destroy the Death Star thanks to a notoriously simple flaw in the thermal exhaust port, and Star Wars lore explains why.

Why didn’t the Death Star have shields? The original Death Star did have shields. This was observed when Luke had to maneuver around the Death Star’s magnetic field. The only weak point in the Death Star was its exposed exhaust pipe. The Death Star 2 was the one that was destroyed by Lando, and it was the one that lacked shielding. Were they constructing the second Death Star while the first still existed? Or was the second Death Star built in those 3 years? Seems like a lot to do in just 3 years, I was wondering if the first Death Star was a kind of diversion to distract the rebels while they built their primary, and much bigger, Death Star. The first Death Star was at least several hundred thousand kilometres away from Yavin IV when it exploded. It had only just achieved line of site with the moon in its orbit around the Yavin gas giant, meaning it would have been much too far away for any great amount of debris to impact the moon. Endor’s forest moon, on the other hand, should have been absolutely devastated going

The second Death Star The 1983 film Return of the Jedi features the DS-2 Orbital Battle Station under construction as it orbits the forest moon Endor, which houses a shield generator protecting the station. The second Death Star is substantially more advanced and more powerful than its predecessor, and the critical weakness found in the first Death Star has been removed—the